Isabella Camacho 11am class

     Our recent group project focused on the theme “elections matter,” addressing topics like gender equality, education policies, immigration policies, and the election process. Each group was tasked with creating a brochure on the theme and giving a presentation. The topics covered included research on these issues, American versus global viewpoints, relevant local and national organizations, historical context, and interviews.

       Group 4, consisting of Yanny Ledesma, Tatyana Matallana, Najohlis Colmenares, Rachel Bardelas, Natalie Alarcon, and Geovany Tabares, was the first to present, covering gender equality. Geovany started with workplace discrimination, discussing its impact in the U.S. and globally. I agree with him; workplaces should be equal environments where all employees can progress without harassment or discrimination. Yanny addressed leadership representation, emphasizing that it should include all genders, regardless of background. I agree, leadership should depend on qualifications, not gender, to best support those being led. Tatyana covered how equal access to higher education is vital for gender equality. I agree, education is essential now more than ever and providing equal access to all backgrounds helps counter misinformation. Najohlis explored cultural norms and stereotypes in the U.S. and beyond, noting how stereotypes can create barriers. I agree; stereotypes like those that reduce women to traditional roles are simply dumb. Natalie discussed preventing violence against women. While I agree, I think it’s also important to note that men can also experience violence from women. Rachel discussed health inequalities rooted in income, education, and geography. I appreciated her points, particularly on the election issue of abortion and the need for freedom of choice despite restrictive state laws. 

     Group 3, made up of Krysten Castaner-Molina, Melany Perez, Lauren Aguiar, Kevin Dorta, Leily Rivero, and Kayla Keddon, presented on the electorate and election process. Kayla opened with local and national associations like neighborhood watch programs, church groups, advocacy organizations, and political parties. I agree with her that these groups are essential in educating citizens about voting, as long as they avoid misinformation. Kevin then gave a historical overview, tracing voting’s significance from the 18th century to today. I agree that history shows voting is crucial and should be accessible to everyone, regardless of race or gender. Krysten highlighted the importance of the election process in ensuring political stability, though I find it confusing why the popular vote doesn’t directly determine the winner. Leily discussed influential presidents, pointing out figures like Washington, Lincoln, and FDR. I agree with her; these leaders’ lasting influence is evident in how often they are referenced. Melany and Lauren focused on voter opinions, stressing the need for these to be heard. I appreciated Lauren’s response to my earlier question about the Electoral College, noting how its divergence from the popular vote can create tension.

    The third group, my group, Group 2, was assigned to discuss education policies. Here are my thoughts on this topic. I think education is crucial, especially for fostering critical thinking in an era where misinformation spreads quickly. In my opinion, Harris’s policies are more beneficial as they aim to improve the lives of students. Overall I feel as everyone who at least tried to put their part did an excellent job on the presentation.

    The final group, Group 1 consisting of Anna Granda, Alyssa Betancourt, Drew Raph-Lundeen, Alexander Redondo, Dashka Louidor, and Aron Cava presented on immigration. Alexander began with a comparison of immigration in the U.S. versus globally, emphasizing how some countries are more open to immigration. He noted that figures like Trump often paint immigration as a threat, despite the U.S. being a diverse and cultural place. Dashka and Aron provided a brief overview of immigration policies, while Alyssa gave a historical perspective. I agree with Alyssa’s point that people often move due to factors beyond their control, and we should welcome them. Anna explained the legal immigration process, giving insight into the steps required to enter the U.S. legally. Drew discussed immigration's economic impact, emphasizing how much fear around immigration is fueled by misinformation. 

    Overall, I think everyone did an excellent job with their presentations. Each group brought forward interesting points and added valuable insights to the discussion. I particularly enjoyed working with my group and felt we put in a lot of effort. Everyone contributed solid research, and our presentation came together very well.